This is quite a game changer - i can now have my cake and eat it too ! I like lightroom's intuitive controls better. This is great - i can now convert all these fuji raw to dng and use lightroom and Camera raw. Capture one was my go-to software for Fuji RAWs and.holy toledo - I can't find any thing lacking in the iridient version - in fact i thought the iridient version looked a bit sharper and sure as hell got better white balanced colors - i've got a new favourite software now - it's Iridient. I tested Iridient's X-Transformer side by side by Capture One. Would I still buy it, feeling as I do now? The answer is yes, I find having the option available, working relatively smoothly with my workflow, and at a reasonable cost, is worthwhile.Ĭare to share any recommended settings for batch converting files? I'm mainly interested in just getting the detail sorted before editing in LR, really struggling with landscape results from the x-trans put straight through LR. So, I find that (to me), rather than being a magic wand, the x-transformer is a useful sddition to my toolbox, which I will use selectively. I find it hard to say which type of image benefits from Iridient, I'm still learning here. The other is one I didn't expect - I don't find that every image benefits from the Iridient conversion, for some images the LR conversion looks better (to me). Now I've moved back to processeng my raf files in LR, then with certain images applying the Iridient conversion as a LR plugin, and then synchronising with the original LR conversion (except for sharpening, which I set at 0). At first I ran every image through it and processed the dngs in LR, giving me huge raw files (form compressed Fuji raws). I've had the x-transformer for about 3 weeks and like it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |